Fox News’ Hannity To Birther Issue: I Wish I Knew How To Quit You
Last night, Fox News’ birther-conspiracy theory pusher Sean Hannity repeatedly told his guests and his audience how he never really believed the birthers. But Hannity, who last night also claimed, birtherism “was never a defining issue for me,” spent most of his show on the Obama birth certificate issue.
For proof of Hannity’s birther-peddling, read, “Coulter: Birther Rumor Discussed Exclusively On Liberal Cable, Not Fox.”
I confess to watching (and tweeting) Hannity a few nights a week while at the gym, so I’d like to thank the good folks at News Hounds for this report and video of Wednesday night’s “Hannity.”
Â
The birth certificate “controversy” was not only the lead-off discussion but took up most of the first three segments on Hannity.
First up, Juan Williams. “Why didn’t he just release it earlier, Juan?†Hannity asked.
Then, later in the segment, Hannity moved on to “just ask,†“Why not release his transcripts? Why not release his thesis?†Then, just as Hannity has pretended all along not to fall in with the birthers, he now said, “I don’t care if he does (release the documents). Honestly, that’s not my focus.â€
In the next segment, with Monica Crowley and Sandra Smith, Hannity reiterated, “This shouldn’t have taken two years on the certificate†and went on to showcase Trump’s newer demand that Obama release his school records and prove he deserved to get into Harvard and Columbia.
At the end of that segment, Hannity promised, “Coming up, much more on Donald Trump and the birth certificate controversy.†Hmmm, wasn’t the controversy just settled????
Hannity introduced the next segment, this one with Malkin, by again complaining that Obama took so long to produce the birth certificate. To repeat, what Obama just produced is a longer form of the birth certificate he had already produced.
With her typical sourpuss condescension, Malkin sneered about Obama “wagging his finger” over the issue and called him, “Mr. Waggy McFingerwagger at the media and everyone else.†And speaking of wagging fingers, Malkin she went on to wag her own finger at “the left wingers†and “the media†who had found the birther issue a “useful tool†with which to “demonize the right.â€
Sure, Michelle, It must have been those liberal activists who somehow infiltrated “fair and balanced†Fox News and got them to discuss birtherism in at least 52 segments since March 2, 2011.
But to her credit, she went on to denounce the whole birther issue and Donald Trump to go with it.
That prompted Hannity to claim, “This wasn’t my issue either, but as time went on, and Donald Trump brought up the issue, it just seemed to me, just release it and it’s over.†Just like it’s over now, I guess!
Even more laughably, Hannity went on to say that now that the birth certificate has been released, “unless anyone comes up with a big smoking gun, it’s not an issue.â€
Well, not until later in the show. When it was time for the Great American Panel segment, Hannity announced that the “big issue involving the birth certificate†was the leadoff topic. Once again, Hannity said, “This was never a defining issue for me but I found it odd… All the president had to do is what he did today. Release it, move on and we’re out of the way. Why did he wait so long?â€
Guest Fran Tarkenton suggested that it was because Obama wanted the distraction and would probably want to “lose his birth certificate again because we know he doesn’t have any plan to get more jobs, to cut the deficit, in Libya or wherever.â€
Guest Alice Stewart, a former Huckabee aide, said, “It should have been done two and a half years ago.â€
Rounding out the “fair and balanced†panel of all conservatives was Fox News’ Peter Johnson who mentioned somewhere that he once worked for the former Democratic mayor of New York, David Dinkins. But Johnson has been a GOP footsoldier on Fox News, including during a recent appearance on Hannity where Johnson gushed over Trump’s birther questions as “common sense.†Johnson made no effort to disavow them here. In fact, Johnson suggested the birth certificate was somehow illegitimate, as he said, “My hope, Sean, is that it was released in good faith, that it’s not about victimology… That’s my concern, whether there’s some deeper plan that goes on here.â€
So how did “Release-It-And-Move-On†Hannity respond? By planting a thoughtful expression on his face and saying, “That’s an interesting thought.†Then he went on to claim, “I always want to stay on the big issues.†But first, Hannity teased the next segment of the Panel: “the church that Barack Obama, the president and his family attended on Easter Sunday.â€
I’m sure Hannity will get to those “big issues†any day now.
Oh, and by the way, it’s not just Hannity. When the news broke that Obama’s long-form birth certificate was available,FoxNews.com let out a dog whistle to birthers by saying the White House had released “what it says (my emphasis) is President Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate.â€
(emphasis mine.)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x2Sg8vuovM0%3Ffs%3D1%26hl%3Den_US
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.