Listen to one of the finest speeches from last night’s marriage equality debate. Senator Nia Gill discusses why she chose to vote “yes,” on the same sex marriage bill that passed New Jersey’s Senate Judiciary Committee 7-6.
Her comments included the need for healthcare of same sex partners, that cannot be provided in any way other than civil marriage. “The issue of health care, the issue of access to health insurance is a paramount issue in our society.”
Play – entire speech:
(Almost) full text:
“When we get to the issue of the constitution [...] History shows you could never have contemplated that marriage is between a man and a woman. If you look at the constitution, at its intent, the constitution intended that African-Americans would never be full participants.
“The legislators – the female ones – would not be here, because the constitution never intended for a woman to have the right to vote. And if we looked further at what the constitution intended – as if it is a stagnant body – then we know that disabled people would have no rights, under the equal protection clause, that they have access to public buildings.
“It is a civil rights issue – not because African-Americans own the copyright to civil rights, it is a civil rights issue in the analysis of the equal protection of the fourteenth amendment in the constitution. And maybe some in my community want to hold on to it, because it’s ours. Because our blood has been shed for the right to vote, and we jealously guard that as a re-affirmation of being American. And so we hold it, because no one can do civil rights and have civil rights better than we do. That’s emotional, but it is certainly not an analysis of the constitutional imperatives that face us. It’s a civil rights issue.
“Each side has an emotional story to tell. So I am not involved in that. But I am involved in how does this strip people of the equality under the law. And as an African-American and as a woman who would jealously guard all the civil rights struggles, this is a civil rights struggle on the magnitude and importance for the people who have died for the right to vote, for the people who have died to allow women the right to vote. And if I took a different stand, which would be a more traditional stand, that the community that identifies with me wants me to take, then I will have breached the tradition and the trust of the elders and the ancestors. And so I vote for the equality of marriage because I believe in the constitution.”
Related posts:
- Listen: NJ Sen Girgenti: I Believe In Equality – Except For Marriage
- Listen: NJ Sen Cardinale Says Straight People Are “Disenfranchised”
- Listen: NJ Senator Sean Kean: The Worst Kind Of Hypocrite
- NJ: How Did Your Senator Vote On Marriage Equality?
- Listen: Teaparty Mom Gets Taken Down By NJ Senator Over Gay Marriage
{ 2 comments }
I was so impressed by Sen. Gill yesterday as she made several points that I honestly wouldn't have considered. Her input was a great example illustration of the importance of diversity in decision making.
Civil Union did not work for my partner and I. Remember the headline GAY DISABLED VETERAN SUE MONTCLAIR, that was only six years ago. When we informed the Montclair Tax collector that we were plaining our Civil Union here in Montclair, she wrote us a letter cancelling my Veterans tax-exempt status. We had to go to Court and eventually won our case. Had I been a 'Heterosexual Veteran' their would have been no problem, but I was a Gay Veteran, thats what made the differance, Civil Union meant nothing to the township.
I think of this every VETERANS DAY, MEMORIAL DAY, and 4TH OF JULY. Do they love our Veterans? Only if they are 'STRAIGHT'!
We need Gay Marriage' Now!
Louis Paul Hennefeld
Staff Sgt. USAF Ret.
Comments on this entry are closed.
{ 1 trackback }