stats for wordpress
 

Trending News: Mitt RomneyBryan FischerAllen WestOccupy MovementGOP War On Women








Are you on Facebook?

Would you please click "like" in the box to your right, or

Visit us on Facebook!


Oscars 2011: The Anti-Social Network – Least-Political Least-Gay Ever?

by David Badash on February 27, 2011

in Celebrities,Civil Rights,culture,News

Post image for Oscars 2011: The Anti-Social Network – Least-Political Least-Gay Ever?

The Oscars, the Academy Awards — whatever you like to call them — almost since their inception have been an opportunity for the greatest stars of the silver screen to share their socio-political views, offer a glimpse into their hearts, and possibly their souls. But not this year. Not at the 83rd annual Academy Awards, where there was little, if any mention of the political struggles in Wisconsin, Libya, Tunisia, or Egypt, the life and death struggles after New Zealand’s earthquake, or the civil rights struggles for equality in LGBT households across the country.

Who can forget Michael Moore’s 2003 anti-Bush Oscar acceptance speech that culminated with the highly critical — and highly criticized — “we live in a time when a man is sending us to war for fictitious reasons!” Was Moore’s statement the last, greatest political commentary at the Oscars? Has the Oscar activism prevalent in the ’60s and the ’70s passed forever?

Perhaps not, but this year’s Academy Awards were unacceptably bereft of loud shout-outs to the people giving their lives for liberty in the Middle East, unacceptably devoid of any mention of climate change, and contained just two hints each of union solidarity and same-sex spousal support.

Wally Pfister, who won “best cinematography” for “Inception,” staged a tiny though solid show of support to his union friends. “Much thanks to Emma Nolan, to Warner Brothers, to my fantastic union crew, and my family, Anna, Nick, Claire, and Mia and to my Mom and Dad. Thanks so much!”

Did you catch it? There, wedged in-between “Warner Brothers” and “family.”

Does anyone know how many of the attendees and winners were union-workers at this year’s Oscars? Yup. Almost all. So much for solidarity.

Another “Inception” Oscar-winner, Gary Rizzo, (photo, right, in the center,) thanked “all the hard working boom operators and utility sound people that worked on the production crew. Union, of course.”

So a real-live lesbian just won for sound mixing Inception. #... on Twitpic

Rizzo’s Oscar co-winner, Lora Hirschberg (above, left, and left, left,) at least had the good sense to kiss her wife as she stood up to go on stage.

The only other same-sex mention came late in the show. “The King’s Speech” producer Iain Canning thanked his boyfriend, Ben.

One of the few other political statements at this year’s Oscars was Charles Ferguson’s impassioned statement: “Forgive me, I must start by pointing out that three years after our horrific financial crisis caused by financial fraud, not a single financial executive has gone to jail, and that’s wrong.”

Ferguson, director of “Inside Job,” won the Academy Award for “Best Documentary Feature,” along with Audrey Marrs.

And, yes, so what about gay rights?

Before you suggest that perhaps there weren’t many gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender winners this year as reason for scant mention of same-sex spouses or the fight for marriage equality, last year’s winner of the “Best Actress” award, Sandra Bullock, said upon receiving her Oscar, “There’s no race, no religion, no class system, no color, nothing, no sexual orientation, that makes us better than anyone else.”

This year, there was no grand mention of marriage equality, the fight for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), the fight against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), or the win against “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT). None.

Were last September’s anti-gay bullying teen suicides so far away from Hollywood that they’ve been forgotten?

Two years ago, thanks to the film “Milk” winning two Oscars, there were many mentions of marriage equality and much hope spoken to same-sex couples.

“To all of the gay and lesbian kids out there who have been told that they are less-than by their families or by the government or by their churches, you are beautiful and wonderful creatures,” said Dustin Lance Black, as he accepted the Oscar for ”Best Original Screenplay” for “Milk.” “And very soon I promise you that you will have equal rights across this great nation of ours.”

That same year, Black’s co-star, Sean Penn, in his acceptance speech — commenting on California’s vote for Prop 8 — added, ”I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect and anticipate their great shame and the shame in their grandchildren’s eyes if they continue that way of support. We’ve got to have equal rights for everyone. And there are, and there are, these last two things. I’m very, very proud to live in a country that is willing to elect an elegant man president and a country who, for all its toughness, creates courageous artists.”

Maybe it was because “The Kids Are All Right” was nominated for four Oscars but won none, (there was no “gay gold,”) that there were no great, impassioned speeches for gay rights at this year’s Academy Awards.

Or maybe it was because, for the most part, this year’s winners, much like this year’s show, just didn’t have any passion in them.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

{ 5 comments }

therandom1 February 28, 2011 at 9:01 am

I was unaware that the Oscars had an obligation to stump any outside agendas other than the craft of film making. You use terms like "unacceptably bereft" or "unacceptably devoid". Really? Unacceptable to whom? While individuals have in the past have chosen of their own free will to use the precious seconds given to them by the Academy to make political statements it looks as if this year most recipients chose to use that time to thank co-workers, family, and friends. And what's wrong with that? Why must everything be some sort of rally? The Oscars are a celebration, not an awareness platform.

David Badash February 28, 2011 at 11:12 am

Not that I'm in the habit of quoting the Bible, but…
"To whomever much is given, of him will much be required; and to whom much was entrusted, of him more will be asked."
– Luke 12:48

Alex February 28, 2011 at 12:50 pm

Why talk about gay rights then, why not talk about the rights of women, whose simpler rights haven't been the priority historically, to abort the unborn, or wait, why not talk about the right of the unborn, beings with least rights of all humans, to be born. Or why not talk about the salvation of the souls through Jesus Christ, that could change people to better if they are sincere in Jesus teaching, and hence all the other issues would improve, or why not talk about of the right of neo nazis to hate whoever they want.

Everyone has a cause, the Oscars have no responsibility to follow specific agendas every year. It can, and that can be nice, and the Oscars should be free to do it, but there is no must.

David Badash February 28, 2011 at 1:05 pm

Well, Alex, sine this i a civil rights blog focused on the rights of LGBTQ people, I advocate for them. I'll let other advocate as they like, although I will say that I have also worked hard for women's civil rights:
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/the-gops-san
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/the-gops-war
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/64-say-unemp
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/punxsutawney

And others…

Julie Cason February 28, 2011 at 11:25 am

I was ticked off by Anne Hathaway making lesbians sound like some kind of party joke. We aren't some kind of punch line or fashion accessory, for heaven's sake. I also read recently what I consider to be a dead-on review of "The Kids Are Alright" (which my wife and I squirmed through) on the NCLR site: http://www.nclrights.org/site/PageServer?pagename

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: