stats for wordpress
 







Are you on Facebook?

Would you please click "like" in the box to your right, or

Visit us on Facebook!


Rick Santorum’s Top Ten Most-Offensive Anti-Gay Comments

by David Badash on June 6, 2011

in Bigotry Watch,News,Politics,Religion

Post image for Rick Santorum’s Top Ten Most-Offensive Anti-Gay Comments

Ultra-homophobe Rick Santorum, who just this morning announced he is officially seeking the Republican nomination for president, has spent a good portion of his political life opposing equality the LGBT community. Here are ten (actually, eleven — we found an extra one) of Rick Santorum’s most-offensive, disgusting statements on gays and lesbians:

 

  • “Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.” (2003)
  •  

  • “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does.”  (2003)
  •  

  • “I guess because you stand for traditional marriage and you believe that, you know, that people should, we should have a society that affirms one man and one woman as marriage, that makes you someone who’s a hater, someone that doesn’t, doesn’t like people. I disagree with people, by the way, who are gay and straight who believe in changing the marriage laws. But it’s a public policy discussion, and this is the, this is really the problem that we see on the left which is the personalization of politics. I mean, we have a policy disagreement, and, and which I am very passionate about. I admit that. Because I do believe the family, integrity of the family is important for the future of our country. But that does not mean that, that I don’t like people or I hate people or that there’s something wrong. The only thing that’s wrong is their opinion.” (2011)
  •  

  • “But what I can say is that the state is not doing a service to the child and to society by not putting that child in a home where there is a mother and a father. This is common sense. This is nature. And what we’re trying to do is defy nature because a certain group of people want to be affirmed by society. And I just don’t think that’s to the benefit of society or to the child.”  (2011)
  •  

  • “Is anyone saying same-sex couples can’t love each other? I love my children. I love my friends, my brother. Heck, I even love my mother-in-law. Should we call these relationships marriage, too?” (2008)
  •  

  • “I’m worried when many people will stand up and say, ‘well whatever the Generals want.’ I’m not too sure that we haven’t indoctrinated the Officer Corps in this country that they can actually see straight to make the right decisions.” (On repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell)  (2011)
  •  

  • On gay adoption: “A lesbian woman came up to me and said, ‘why are you denying me my right?’ I said, ‘well, because it’s not a right.’ It’s a privilege that society recognizes because society sees intrinsic value to that relationship over any other relationship.” (2011)
  •  

  • “I certainly would not approve of [a bill moving through the California legislature compels the state to add gay history to the state education curriculum], but there’s a logical consequence to the courts injecting themselves in creating rights and people attaching their legislative ideas to those rights that in some respects could logically flow from that. So I’m not surprised.” (On teaching LGBT history in schools) (2011)
  •  

  • “I would argue, this right to privacy … doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you — this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it’s my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that’s antithetical to strong healthy families. Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, where it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family.” (2003)
  •  

  • I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships. And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual. I have nothing, absolutely nothing against anyone who’s homosexual. If that’s their orientation, then I accept that. And I have no problem with someone who has other orientations. The question is, do you act upon those orientations? So it’s not the person, it’s the person’s actions. And you have to separate the person from their actions.” (2003)
  •  

  • “In this case, what we’re talking about, basically, is priests who were having sexual relations with post-pubescent men. We’re not talking about priests with 3-year-olds, or 5-year-olds. We’re talking about a basic homosexual relationship.” (On the Catholic Church’s international pedophile priests scandal, in which, for decades, priests have sexually assaulted, molested, and raped young boys and girls.) (2003)

The good folks at Think Progress have published a wider list of “Rick Santorum’s 12 Most Offensive Statements,” including on race and Islam.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Friends:

We invite you to sign up for our new mailing list, and subscribe to The New Civil Rights Movement via email or RSS.

Also, please like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter!

{ 5 comments }

BeckyStine June 6, 2011 at 6:11 pm

About his first quote, if society's main goal is to have children so the society continues, then why isn't Santorum for polygamy? I mean really, he is limiting people to monogamous relationships when if we let men have more than one wife he could produce many more children in the same amount of time, than if he were to have one wife. I mean if it's all about children, like he says, then he needs to be pro-polygamy.

JohnBovay June 6, 2011 at 10:52 pm

An even more troubling perspective on Mr. Santorum (and other GOP candidates):

| Texas Gov. Rick Perry Partnering with New Apostolic Groups for Houston "Call to Prayer": http://bit.ly/kfaEq5 via @addthis http://www.talk2action.org/story/2011/6/6/112828/

Summary: "Another politician joins forces with the apostles. Texas Governor Rick Perry is leading an event in Houston on August 6 with the "apostolic and prophetic" movement, including leaders from Lou Engle's "The Call," Mike Bickle's International House of Prayer, and the American Family Association. The Call is a virulently anti-gay and anti-abortion event held in stadiums and large venues, including one in Uganda that featured speakers promoting the "Kill the Gays" bill…

…Politicians competing for the support of this prayer warrior network prior to the presidential primaries include Sarah Palin, who has an over twenty-year relationship with Alaskan Apostle Mary Glazier; Newt Gingrich, who was anointed by Lou Engle on an internationally televised broadcast in 2009; Michelle Bachman, Rick Santorum, and now, apparently, Rick Perry…"

JohnBovay June 6, 2011 at 10:59 pm

BTW. For those who may be interested, here's a link sheet I maintain re the encroaching theocracy.
(It also has a number of links which may be helpful to LGBTers and their parents.)

HOW GAYS ARE BEING USED TO CREATE A THEOCRACY http://howgaysarebeingusedtocreateatheocracy.blog

leQ August 12, 2011 at 11:24 am

so, lemme get this straight (no pun intended): tricky ricky's ok with homosexuals, but what the gays DO is wrong, huh? well, ricky might be a nice guy underneath all that hate, but his speeches are dead-ass wrong. he doesn't WANT to understand what gays are all about. he can't fathom that god luvs us too. that he goes around stirring up other potential haters, should be a crime. inciting hate should be as much a crime as anything else.

SantiagoJJJr October 21, 2011 at 8:32 pm

Rick Santorum Googles Santorum: OMG!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5y-txummHq4

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: