An unrepentant Karen Handel was forced to resign from Susan G. Komen for the Cure today, after her attack on Planned Parenthood drew the ire of a nation. Handel, who served as Senior Vice President of Public Policy for less than a year, was instrumental in the strategy of defunding Planned Parenthood of an annual grant worth about $680,000, although she says the decision had been made prior to her hiring in April of 2011. Handel, whose views on abortion, gay rights, and other so-called “culture war” issues are to the right of draconian, issued a statement acknowledging her role and unrepentantly standing by her positions.
READ: Komen: The Extreme Anti-Gay Views Of Their VP Who Dumped Planned Parenthood
Her resignation letter, printed in full below, makes no attempt to protect Komen, and states bluntly, “Komen’s decision to change its granting strategy and exit the controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood and its grants was fully vetted by every appropriate level within the organization.” In fact, Handel has waived her severance package, “which might have required her to keep silent,” notes Jim Galloway at the Atlanta Journal Constitution, who adds that Handel has arranged for a press conference this afternoon.
No doubt Handel has offers at a variety of anti-gay, anti-women organizations and will use her new-found notoriety for ill.
February 7, 2012
The Honorable Nancy Brinker
CEO, Susan G. Komen for the Cure VIA EMAIL
5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 250
Dallas, Texas 75244
Dear Ambassador Brinker:
Susan G. Komen for the Cure has been the recognized leader for more 30 years in the fight against breast cancer here in the US – and increasingly around the world.
As you know, I have always kept Komen’s mission and the women we serve as my highest priority – as they have been for the entire organization, the Komen Affiliates, our many supporters and donors, and the entire community of breast cancer survivors. I have carried out my responsibilities faithfully and in line with the Board’s objectives and the direction provided by you and Liz.
We can all agree that this is a challenging and deeply unsettling situation for all involved in the fight against breast cancer. However, Komen’s decision to change its granting strategy and exit the controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood and its grants was fully vetted by every appropriate level within the organization. At the November Board meeting, the Board received a detailed review of the new model and related criteria. As you will recall, the Board specifically discussed various issues, including the need to protect our mission by ensuring we were not distracted or negatively affected by any other organization’s real or perceived challenges. No objections were made to moving forward.
I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it. I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen’s future and the women we serve. However, the decision to update our granting model was made before I joined Komen, and the controversy related to Planned Parenthood has long been a concern to the organization. Neither the decision nor the changes themselves were based on anyone’s political beliefs or ideology. Rather, both were based on Komen’s mission and how to better serve women, as well as a realization of the need to distance Komen from controversy. I believe that Komen, like any other nonprofit organization, has the right and the responsibility to set criteria and highest standards for how and to whom it grants.
What was a thoughtful and thoroughly reviewed decision – one that would have indeed enabled Komen to deliver even greater community impact – has unfortunately been turned into something about politics. This is entirely untrue. This development should sadden us all greatly.
Just as Komen’s best interests and the fight against breast cancer have always been foremost in every aspect of my work, so too are these my priorities in coming to the decision to resign effective immediately. While I appreciate your raising a possible severance package, I respectfully decline. It is my most sincere hope that Komen is allowed to now refocus its attention and energies on its mission.
Friends:
We invite you to sign up for our new mailing list, and subscribe to The New Civil Rights Movement via email or RSS.
Also, please like us on Facebook, and follow us on Twitter!
{ 2 comments }
Handel seems to be claiming that she is being made a scapegoat, and I believe that that is probably true to a certain extent. I doubt that she could have brought-about this organizational change by herself, and there was no publicly discernible cry of alarm from within the group, so there must have been some internal support for the change. Unless one is inside an organization such as this one never knows the extent to which her position gave her the power to quash opposition. While I doubt she could have managed the change by herself, she might have made life difficult for those who opposed her. While I respect (in theory) her decision to forego severance pay in order to sidestep admission of blame, I suspect that is specifically to allow her to air her story in public (as the author suggests) and that she will be catapulted into a position of power in some right-wing anti-woman anti-LGBT organization and do just fine for herself. In fact — keep your eye on the 2014 elections.
Good riddance and what a load of shit. What does "fully vetted by every appropriate level within the organization" mean. Just the usual bunch of words that say nothing.
Non-profits live and die by donations. Their boards are going to favor policies that keep the donations coming in as long as there isn't a conflict with the mission. It's not hard to spin what the board and staff are told regarding donors' reactions to making grants to a group like Planned Parenthood. I'd guess that's just what they did — too bad they got it wrong. It would have been so much simpler and quieter to let the current grant expire right on schedule and not renew it — and that is likely all Handel's fault for catering to her own political views.
Komen still isn't worth donating to. Of the total program expenses, their grant making expenditures (research, health screening, treatment) are too low (46%) and their public education expenditures (54%) are very high (somewhere around 30% of which accompanies fundraising materials, it's hard to parse out because the detailed info isn't required to be there, but joint expenses generally mean education + fundraising.) When over half of a program's expenses consists of salaries, professional fees, race production and "education" that accompanies fundraising materials, something really, really stinks. Dunno what but it's not good.
Comments on this entry are closed.