A photo the Israel Defense Forces published to Facebook on Sunday to celebrate gay pride month is actually fake, the IDF has now admitted. But is it? What constitutes a fake photo? The IDF acknowledges the photo was staged, only one of the two men holding hands is gay, they men are not a couple, but in fact co-workers at the IDF Spokesperson’s Office.
The Times of Israel seems especially angered by the “staged” and “misleading” photo:
The newly hip, multimedia-savvy IDF Spokesperson’s Office posted Monday on its Facebook page a photo of two ostensibly gay soldiers, one seeming to belong to the Givati Brigade and the other to the Artillery Corps, holding hands and walking on a city street.
In fact, the two soldiers in the photo are not a couple, only one of the two is gay, and both the soldiers serve in the IDF Spokesperson’s Office.
The picture appears to have been taken on Itamar Ben Avi street in Tel Aviv, around the corner from the Spokesperson’s Office headquarters.
Contacted by The Times of Israel, the IDF Spokesperson’s Office did not deny the photo was staged, offering the following statement: “The photo reflects the IDF’s open minded attitude towards soldiers of all sexual orientations. The IDF respects the privacy of the soldiers featured in the photograph, and will not comment on their identities.”
The photo has garnered thousands of “likes” on Facebook and has been hailed by the Foreign Ministry as evidence of the Israeli army’s unique tolerance toward homosexuality.
So, how is a “staged” photo “misleading”? Is it any more misleading than a U.S. Army recruiting ad? Unless the IDF does not accept equality for LGBT people, is posting the photo wrong if they did not claim anything false?
The Times adds:
Male homosexual sex was outlawed in Israel until 1988, and in the 1950s the IDF was the only official state institution to try and jail soldiers for engaging in such behavior, according to the Israeli National LGBT Task Force.
But since then much has changed. The IDF Spokesperson’s Office called the matter of homosexuality a “non-issue,” saying that “just as there is no policy in places for blonds and brunets, so too is there no special policy for gays.”
Homosexuals may serve in any military unit they choose, combat or noncombat, the spokesperson added.
The exact number of gay and transgender soldiers is one of the better-kept secrets in the army, according to Chen Langer of the Israeli National LGBT Task Force. While the army evaluators who conduct pre-induction interviews are trained to identify gay soldiers and to ask them about their sexual orientation, the questions are always “in the realm of affirmative action,” he said.
They file the information, he said, so that if a soldier asks to serve close to home or for privacy in the showers they will have on record that he or she has special needs.
In its officer training the army includes presentations from LGBT rights groups, perhaps outperforming all other large organizations in Israel in its acceptance of homosexuality.
But while homosexuality in the ranks is officially accepted, the army appears to remain sensitive to the sexual orientation of higher-ranking officers, Langer said, and there are few homosexuals in the upper echelons of the armed services.
What are your thoughts?
We invite you to sign up for our new mailing list, and subscribe to The New Civil Rights Movement via email or RSS.