Red State’s Caleb Howe Takes 1372 Words To Tell Roger Ebert He’s Sorry
I don’t like Caleb Howe. But I love Twitter. And I use it all the time. To meet people, to form communities, to understand how people think. For me, Twitter is all about people. And every time I hit “enter,” I know every one of those 140-or-less-character messages I send is going to affect some of the 7000+ folks who are following my tweets. So I make sure that what I say has relevance, and even the tweets I send that attack people don’t attack people.
That’s one of my main issues with the thought process on the Right. Ad hominen attacks are how they go about their day. On Twitter, at Tea Parties, on Glenn Beck’s show, on RedState, the Right loves to attack you as a person. Not just your positions, your ideas, your beliefs, but you. And that’s where I draw the line.
I’ve made a lot of tough comments about, and too, a lot of people. But you’d be hard-pressed to find any tweet I’ve sent, or any blog post I’ve written, or anything I’ve verbalized, that attacked a person — how they look, their ethnic background, their orientation, who they are, as a person.
But back to Caleb Howe. As you probably know at this point, Caleb Howe blogs at RedState, one of the most right-wing blogs ever. Howe likes to get down-and-dirty, and, by his own admission, he likes to get down with the vodka, too. I’ll confess I didn’t know who he was until a few days ago, when I read how he had viciously attacked Roger Ebert via Twitter. You’ve read the piece over at Gawker, (or the other piece at Gawker,) or the one at Esquire, or the one at CNN… Yes, Caleb Howe knows how to make a name for himself. See, it was all a test. It was his “plan.”
Caleb Howe, on Saturday, decided to take on Roger Ebert by making fun of his cancer. Media Matters has screenshots of his actual tweets, but I’ll share a few of them here:
CalebHowe: I mean, honestly. How many pieces need to fall off @ebertchicago before he gets the hint to shut the fuck up?
CalebHowe: You know, @ebertchicago, I’m not as expert on flag etiquette as you. Tell me, which do I fly when you die of cancer?
I’ll leave it at that, though there are plenty more.
Caleb Howe represents the tea party movement, the right-wing radical movement, and the right-wing blogosphere perfectly. Don’t like someone’s stance on an issue? Call them a “goat fucking child molester.” What? Yup. That’s what Caleb Howe’s boss, Erick Erickson, who runs RedState but is also a CNN contributor, said on the news that David Souter was retiring from the Supreme Court. In fact, the entire sentence was, “The nation loses the only goat fucking child molester ever to serve on the Supreme Court in David Souter’s retirement.”
So, it should come as no shock that Howe would sink so low as to say of Ebert, “…he’ll be dead really really soon. So fuck him.”
I suppose, one could argue, that’s almost tame by comparison.
Anyway, it’s this type of rhetoric that serves as the daily fare by the RedState crowd.
Howe did, finally, apologize. In “I Don’t Like Roger Ebert,” Howe takes almost all of its 1372 words to actually apologize, saying that he “forgot about humanity.” Damned right he did.
But given the RedState culture of calling a Supreme Court justice a “goat fucking child molester,” of threatening to “pull out a shotgun on a census worker,” suggesting beating a politician “to a bloody pulp for being an idiot,” and demanding Americans “tell Nancy Pelosi and the Congress to send Obama to a death panel,” what can you expect?
Howe decided to appear last night on “The Stage Right Show,” a podcast that promised, “some serious “half hour of hate.” Howe claimed his “plan” to attack Ebert was “How do I hurt him?” The host laughed when Howe recalled his tweets about Ebert dying of cancer. “You were purposely being provocative because you had an end-game.” So? Justified? No.
Howe, on the podcast, mumbled something about how “Twitter’s off the record.” It’s not. (He and Erick Erickson, his boss, certainly should realize that by now.) He claimed his plan was to expose hypocrisy by riling up Ebert’s Twitter followers, by saying terrible things. His plan was to “trap them in their hypocrisy.” And he added, “my bottom line is that everyone’s a douche.”
Evidently, one of those “everybodys” is Oliver Willis, a blogger for the media watchdog Media Matters, which Howe and the host attempted to skewer during the show.
Later, after his Saturday salvo, Howe tweeted to those who criticized his heinous attack on Ebert (including your truly,) saying, “Ahh irony,” and “lol. Irony.” Because those criticizing him, to his way of thinking, were equally guilty as he. Proportion and intent, in Howe’s mind, evidently don’t matter.
What Howe didn’t get, and maybe, maybe does now, is that there’s a difference between attacking someone’s political positions, and attacking them as a human being.
But I don’t hold much hope. Given one of Caleb Howe’s most-recent tweets, I’d say he’s back to his old ways…
Ah, irony.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
|
Maine Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Graham Platner is under fire after releasing a video declaring that new allegations against him are false, yet he is “taking time to reflect” on a path forward.
Politico on Monday afternoon reported that a woman who dated Platner, Jenny Racicot, “says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.”
“Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner,” Politico reported, “for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.”
In a video posted to social media eleven minutes after the Politico story dropped, Platner says, “I wanted to directly address the troubling, serious, and false allegations against me. Any accusation of nonconsensual behavior is categorically false.”
He said he and his supporters “were united in a love of Maine, a belief that our politics must change, in a focus on defeating Susan Collins.”
“So, regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting, but mindful the political reality will inflict, we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward for the state that I love, the people that I love, the movement I belong to, and the goal of defeating Susan Collins.”
“Those were the goals when we launched this campaign. And they remain my goals today.”
“Throughout it all, you never turned your back on me. And I will not turn my back on you now. Every one of you deserves to see that vision come to fruition and see Susan Collins defeated. And we will use every tool at our disposal to do so.”
The Bulwark’s Tim Miller, a political commentator who served as the communications director for the Jeb Bush 2016 presidential campaign, blasted Platner.
“I’m sorry but ‘we are taking time to reflect on the best path forward’ is not an option on the table,” Miller wrote. “Either it’s false and you campaign with vigor or it’s true and you get out / apologize to everyone you let down.”
Journalist Ryan Grim, commenting on Platner’s video, noted that Platner “strongly suggests he is considering dropping out. Already Troy Jackson and Chellie Pingree, both gubernatorial candidates, are being kicked around in Maine circles as potential replacements.”
Several others, including Puck News’ Peter Hamby, predicted Platner will be dropping out.
Platner had postponed several campaign events before the Politico story was published.
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) July 6, 2026
President Donald Trump is facing backlash after posting a video of children — including showing their unblurred faces — graduating from kindergarten, with some of the girls purportedly wearing hijabs.
“President Trump posted a captionless video of graduating kindergarteners on Truth Social on Monday, goading his supporters into verbally attacking little children simply for being Muslim,” The New Republic reported. “The clip is from Gateway STEM Academy, a majority-Black K-8 public charter school in St. Paul, Minnesota. It shows about 21 children in caps and gowns on stage singing a song together. Most of the girls are wearing hijabs.”
The original post of the video which Trump reposted reads: “Public school in St. Paul, Minnesota. Every girl is in a hijab … in kindergarten.”
Trump did not add any comments. TNR called the post “Islamophobic, weird, and creepy,” while noting that the comments section of Trump’s post was filled with calls “by racist, xenophobic MAGA supporters” to “deport the children and ban hijabs.”
TNR also noted that it “should come as no surprise that Trump isn’t above attacking children who just learned how to read, but this post is still particularly discomforting—and will certainly contribute to the already potent level of anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. and in Minnesota.”
Critics blasted Trump.
“There is something deeply unsettling about the president of the United States—the most powerful person in the world—going after kindergarten schoolchildren in Minnesota because they wore hijabs, as Trump has done this morning on his website,” The Bulwark’s Sam Stein wrote.
One social media commentator wrote, “Trump posted an unblurred video of more than a dozen Muslim kindergartners to Truth Social, exposing the children’s faces while targeting them for their religion.”
Another added, “Trump is a bigot. The president took to Truth Social to attack kindergarteners in hijabs. These are little kids. The president isn’t just a bigot, he’s also a coward.”
The original video was posted to the X social media platform in June.
U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) at the time commented, “If you are in a public school in America, you should be speaking english.”
Image via Reuters
President Donald Trump’s apparent efforts to delay releasing the $5.8 million civil judgment to E. Jean Carroll are being met with a warning by the journalist’s legal team, who suggest there could be a legal maneuver for Trump to employ to forgo paying the judgment in either of the two cases he lost.
According to The Guardian, on July 4, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered Trump to release the $5.8 million judgment, which is in escrow, to Carroll by this coming Tuesday — or explain why he would not do so.
Carroll’s attorneys think Trump may be trying to buy time to mount another legal strategy, telling the judge that Trump’s request for an extension “appears to be little more than yet another play for time.”
“The case is separate from Trump’s appeal of a Manhattan civil jury’s 2024 award of $83.3m to Carroll for defamation,” The Guardian explains. “But her lawyers have suggested a legal scenario in which the president might seek to conjoin the cases and further delay payment of both.”
Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan (no relation to the judge) wrote, “We can only assume that defendant is seeking … to buy time so he can try to concoct some new basis to put off paying plaintiff presumably in connection with his forthcoming petition and motion for a rehearing.”
Trump’s former attorney, Justin Smith, in one of his final acts, wrote to the Supreme Court suggesting that his client would be appealing the $83.3 million civil judgment.
Smith argued that the Supreme Court “may wish to consider the petitions together,” given they involve the same parties.
The larger judgment case involves possible questions of presidential immunity, and that has Carroll’s attorneys concerned.
“A conjoined case, Carroll’s lawyers fear, could result in both judgments being wiped out,” The Guardian reports.
The president has also made clear he is no fan of Judge Kaplan, after the jurist made several rulings that “angered” Trump.
“What else can you expect from a Trump Hating, Clinton appointed judge, who went out of his way to make sure that the result was as negative as it could possible be,” Trump wrote on Truth Social in 2023, “speaking to, and in control of, a jury from an anti-Trump area which is probably the worst place in the US for me to get a fair ‘trial’.”
Image via Reuters
Platner Scorched Over ‘Taking Time’ Video After New Accusation
Trump Sparks Fury Online After Posting Unblurred Video of Muslim Kindergartners in Hijabs
One Legal Maneuver Threatens to Undo Everything E. Jean Carroll Won
Inside the Group Helping MAGA Voters Walk Away — And What Finally Pushed Them
